IMF economists review reserve currency alternatives
The worst
economic downturn in 70 years has revived concerns over a monetary
"non-system" where the weaknesses have amplified as emerging
economies built up reserves to self-insure against capital account crises in
recent years, the economists say.
The economists
laid out their thoughts in a paper that does not commit the International
Monetary Fund as an institution and essentially amounts to a review of options
governments may want to consider as they seek to deliver on G20 pledges to push for a more
balanced economic system.
To ease
reserve demand, policymakers could explore promoting alternatives ranging from
third-party insurance to a system where countries could borrow from global or
regional reserve pools through a lender of last resort.
The latter was
a role the IMF could play but only if it had far greater resources, said the
paper, which noted that academic estimates of the necessary resources were
anything from $1 trillion to limitless.
"In
addition to the IMF, other insurance arrangements, such as regional pools and
bilateral swaps, would be useful complements, although with more limited scale,
scope for risk sharing, and surveillance arrangements," says the paper.
Many of the
ideas aimed at attenuating demand for reserves would only partially address the
problem, however, and there was still a need to consider alternative reserve
currency systems in place of the currency dollar-based one, it says.
Alternatives
ranged from a system of multiple or competing reserve currencies with no
dominant one, a system based on the IMF's SDR unit of account that pools the
main reserve currencies or a totally new global currency that trades alongside
others.
A
multi-currency system could emerge with time even if there were few precedents
and the most likely contenders were the euro in the first instance and later on
the yen and yuan, the paper says.
"Such a
system would impose policy discipline on reserve issuers, as concerns about the
value of one currency could lead to a shift towards the others," it says.
"The
'exorbitant privilege' currently enjoyed by the
"The SDR
-- which is a claim on a basket of currencies but not a currency itself -- is
enjoying a renaissance after falling into near oblivion for decades," the
economists say in the paper.
"By
being available as a composite product, the SDR also offers a convenient means
of reserve diversification and stable store of value," the paper says,
noting however that governments would have encourage and subsidies development
of a private SDR market -- that is, private borrowers issuing SDR-denominated
debt.
More
radically, another option would be a new currency used in international
transactions and issued by an international monetary agency "quite
different from today's IMF", the paper says.
"Disconnected
from the economic problems of any individual country and with a balance sheet
backed by the membership of the institution, this currency could serve as the
global risk-free asset."
"However,
a solution of this nature seems so impossibly taxing of
"Yet, a monetary institution with even more demanding features -- the ECB -- is celebrating its 11th anniversary this year. If an SDR-based system were to emerge at some stage, taking the next step to a sui generis global currency may seem less of a giant leap than from today's vantage point."